User:Dmitri tikhonov/sandbox

I spent some time looking for reliable sources that would demonstrate LiteSpeed Web Server's notability and I found what I think are good references: There are two things I would like to point out:
 * A book on system administration by a major publisher recommends considering using LiteSpeed Web Server as one of Apache alternatives that are faster than Apache and use less memory. (The other alternatives listed are lighttpd and Zeus.)
 * A research paper presented three months ago at a conference of a major technical professional organization counts LiteSpeed Web Server in the list of six popular HTTP/2 implementations (the other five are Apache, H2O, nghttpd, Nginx, and Tengine). In this paper, the LiteSpeed implementation of HTTP/2 compares favorably to the others in several ways.
 * Another research paper from 2017 presented by at a different conference of another major organization by a team from Communication and Distributed Systems department of the largest technical university in Germany include LiteSpeed Web Server in the list of web servers that dominate H2-capable set of web server software (others being Nginx, IdeaWebServer, Apache, and IIS).
 * 1) LiteSpeed is definitely being both noted and noticed.
 * 2) Majority of the other web servers in the lists above -- Apache, H2O, IdeaWebServer, IIS, lighttpd, nghttpd, Nginx, Tengine, and Zeus -- have dedicated Wikipedia pages.  (Those that do not have dedicated pages are either relative new (H2O, Tengine) or obscure for English-speaking audience (IdeaWebServer).)