User:Dmontalvo98/Bioplastic/Paco BRG Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Dmontalvo98
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Dmontalvo98/Bioplastic

Lead
Guiding questions:

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? There is no the complete content so it's complicated to say it's neutral for now
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Maybe the want of showing how the bioplastics are can overrepresent some aspects but for the moment it's okay
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No content for now but maybe it will

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? It's in project

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No content for now
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media No

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article will probably be more complete
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?