User:Dngo1023/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Ecological health


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic. However, there are many sub contents need to have more information and source. The tone of article remains neutral throughout. Some of the claims do not have sources to back but they link towards to other article. But when the article is using sources, it is reliable and draws from books. Some of the claims also need clarification and other sources need to be added. They can also elaborate on ecotage, deforestation, and destruction of deep sea.
 * The article is fairly new and does not have a rating. It is considered a Start-Class on quality's scale. There is no suggestions on the Talk page yet. It is belong to the WikiProject Environmental


 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Blast fishing


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is very interesting! The content is relevant to the topic about blast fishing. The tone of this article is neutral. It is stating a lot of facts and sources to back up about one of the big environmental issues we are dealing with. The citations are reliable. However, there need to be more research about the History of the Blast fishing. The article mentions that blast fishing concept started in WWII. I think this article can elaborate on it! This article is ranked C for the project's quality scale!
 * After reading this talk page and conversation, one of the questions left unanswered was how does the dynamite work when fishermen dropped it in the water? This is worth to do research on.


 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Environmental science


 * Article Evaluation
 * Although the content is related to the topic, some of the sub contents have more information than the other. Although some of the sources are reliable, some of the claims are not backed up with sources. For example, "Environmental studies incorporates more of the social sciences for understanding human relationships, perceptions and policies towards the environment. Environmental engineering is focuses on design and technology for improving environmental quality in every aspect". One question that I raise is that what are some examples of how environmental engineering is focuses on design and? technology? This is part of the WikiProject Environment, and it is rated as a C article. After reading the talk page, I agree that the content is losing focus throughout the article and it needs to address the sub contents in the main introduction.


 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Talk:Environmental education


 * Article Evaluation
 * Content is related to the topic. Although the content is related to the topic. The article can be broken down to sub contents and incorporating more in-depth research in international places. It is an overall broad topic and has a lot of potential meat in the content. Research topic could be where have EE already taken places beside UNESCO. The sources and citations are reliable. Sub content-renewable energy needs to be expand on. One of the main idea would be beneficial for the article is what are the benefits of EE. This is part of the WikiProject Environment. It is rated as a C article.

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Climate change education
 * Article Evaluation
 * Content is related to topic. The article is persuasive about the important of climate change education. Sources and citation work properly. The tone of the article is neutral backed up by many facts. More information could be added in the sub contents of each country. The list of countries taking action in climate change education can also be expanded. This article had not been rated or be part of any WikiProject.
 * Content is related to topic. The article is persuasive about the important of climate change education. Sources and citation work properly. The tone of the article is neutral backed up by many facts. More information could be added in the sub contents of each country. The list of countries taking action in climate change education can also be expanded. This article had not been rated or be part of any WikiProject.


 * Sources