User:Dnh22/Deaf plus/Alanakay13 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dnh22, Hayleydt, Friedlandl19


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Dnh22/Deaf plus


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * n/a

Evaluate the drafted changes
What a great article about Deaf plus! There's hardly any for me to give feedback, but I have several to give.

Introduction: The introduction to Deaf plus is excellent. I really like how you give another word for deaf plus, percentages and common extra disabilities! My only feedback is "Diagnostic overshadowing" is for introduction part need to be formatted better. It looks like uncompleted sentence.

Contents: is there any organization that support for deaf plus in the United States? Resources may be helpful. Maybe you can add "See more" or "External links" for the people to find. Not just that, I am sure there are histories about deaf plus, so perhaps there can be a section about history of deaf plus?

Disabilities: For both hereditary syndromes and Maternal infections, I would suggest to have a very brief summary of each. Also, try to make same format with link attached to word like "Cerebral Palsy". It should be at the heading or change "down syndrome"'s attached link in the subtext, not the title.

I am not grammar person, but I am not sure if "3%, or 1 in 59, of deaf..." would work better instead of "3% of, or 1 in 59, deaf...".

The rest of that section looks fabulous!

Language: I would suggest to add which year did those 264 teachers of Deaf reported in the sentence. This section is where it needs some extra details. Maybe you can add more on the appearance in classroom for those deaf plus with their language usage?

Image: If possible, I think adding images can improve the article.

Really... you did amazing! Keep up a great work!