User:DoABarrelRoll.dev/Archive/Rights

Rollback (May 2017)
Hi DoABarrelRoll.dev. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ADoABarrelRoll.dev enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! S warm  ♠  03:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * User:Swarm, please look at this editor's shooting from the hip on Cornhole. Thanks. 71.91.45.233 (talk) 04:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * So, Huggle is an off-wiki program that automatically goes through new and unregistered users' recent changes so trustworthy users can review them. It can pick up on suspicious recent edits and it's very easy to go through them and revert and warn extremely quickly. As this user's explained, they were still getting used to it and made a mistake. That seems believable to me. I appreciate you reverting the vandalism, and I trust DABR will learn from their mistakes, as do we all. That being said, he probably saw the word "dummy" being inserted by an IP who was probably identified by the software as having been warned in the past. I can see how at first glance you would think that's vandalism, especially if you're working at a fast pace. We have virtually zero tolerance for willful abuse or incompetence, but we don't issue punishments for users who make mistakes. I doubt that it's necessary to remind this user to try to avoid reinstating vandalism. S warm   ♠  05:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)