User:Docjp/James W. Patterson, Ph.D., Esogist

--Docjp (talk) 17:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)It seems reasonable to begin this page: James W. Patterson, Ph.D., Esogist, with a statement from James W. Patterson, Ph.D., Esogist, himself or myself in this case. The problem is... Wikipedia does not consider a person about whom others may write capable of writing about himself. The reason for this is strange and peculiar and explainable... but not easily comprehended. The typical intellectual uses and is essentially confined to use of the Left-Hemisphere of the brain in his or her "thinking" about Life. Generally unknown to this person is the fact that it is his or her MIND realm that directs and monitors such "thinking". This then is the essential "reason" the intellectual does not "trust" what he/she thinks and must rely on a "collective" body of evidence to "prove" that what he/she "thinks" is true. The search for the Truth - that is, an Absolute Reality that cannot be other than it is, ever... is what everyone is looking to find, and few do. The reason is that the Truth, or Absolute Reality cannot be found in the physical plane of existence [which of course includes ones brain and its "thinking".

Those individuals who have tapped the Spiritual dimension within themselves are rare. [Such people include "psychics", and even among psychics each person has a peculiar "gift" that is somewhat unique to him or her. What I am speaking to is the "faculty" by which such people gain "insight" within the subtle Esoteric dimensions of themselves. This insight has been earned over lifetimes, by ascending what I refer to as the "Ladder of Life" [an analogy I use to help explain how we Souls slowly rise in "Consciousness". Should a person desire to know more, I suggest exploring my web site. I refer to this "faculty" of psychics, and others like myself, as "Intuition". And what one discovers via "intuition" is of an Esoteric Reality [consisting of multiple dimensions or energies] that can be experienced by ones Intuition, but such energy cannot be conveyed to others... except by abstract words, terms, or symbols. In other words, ones physical senses cannot perceive the Esoteric vibrational (reality) of this intuited "Knowledge". For this reason the "intellectual" [or the normal person who is confined to use of his or her brain and thinking to comprehend Life] "thinks" that what the person who has awakened to some bit of Esoteric insight [Knowledge] from within his or her Spiritual dimension is "delusional".

We therefore have a basic and fundamental problem in communication and understanding. The larger number of individuals are Left-Hemisphere of the brain dominant, and this means they are confined to "thinking" and do not possess an active faculty of intuition with which to evaluate or recognize the Esoteric nature of Reality that those whose "intuition" has awakened within them, and they can perceive via their intuition. --Docjp (talk) 20:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)--Docjp (talk) 20:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC) But they are unable to convey this Esoteric Reality in any form other than intellectual words that "point to", or "stand for" such Esoteric phenomena. But these "abstract" words do not and cannot actually convey the Esoteric phenomena itself... except that one whose faculty of intuition is "ready" to awaken to the same Esoteric vibrational energy that another has experienced can identify from within that person [via his or her faculty of Intuition] a vibrational experience of the exact same Truth resonating within the person seeking to share what he/she Knows via abstract means. Alas... this has no meaning to those confined to the brain and thinking. This "fact" cannot, of course, be proven to those unable to "experience" this fact via their own Intuition.

This Esoteric vibrational energy - which is part of one's own "Knowledge", is True. Of course none of this can be "proven" for the convenience of the intellectual [since, again, the Esoteric cannot be perceived via physical means, which means the brain or thinking]. And for Wikipedia to deny or remove what I have just explained is indefensible. But to expect that the typical intellectual would allow an expression of Fact... that cannot be proven by physical means, is perhaps unrealistic to expect. So I was surprised today, February 29, 2012, when by chance, I came upon this old writing of mine, and found it still in existence. At 76, I may not be here again?

Hopefully, others may have an opportunity to read this... before it is deleted? --Docjp (talk) 17:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)--Docjp (talk) 17:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)--Docjp (talk) 20:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)--Docjp (talk) 20:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)