User:Dohanminhtho/Acid rain/Hjnelson02 Peer Review

General info
Dohanminhtho
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dohanminhtho/Acid_rain?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Acid rain

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I like that information about nitrogen dioxide and sulfur trioxide were added to a bunch of different sections to make the article feel more cohesive. The lead was updated to reflect what was added to the article and it was concise to explain a little bit about what the sections added were about. The content is relevant and up to date and filled in a knowledge gap that was present in the article. The compounds added were not mentioned in the article before but are found in acid rain.

The content added was neutral and didn't have any sort of biases. All the facts are backed up with reliable sources. The sources are also current and say the same things that are in the draft. The links work and most of them are primary and/or reliable sources. The organization is also good and the writing doesn't have any errors and is clear and informational. No images were added. I also like all the additional links to other Wikipedia articles. Should probably change the NO2 and SO3 so that the numbers are in a subscript.