User:Dohanminhtho/Acid rain/Naomistow31 Peer Review

General info
Dohanminhtho
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Acid rain
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dohanminhtho/Acid_rain&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template&veaction=edit&redirect=no
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

At this point in time, the author has only written one sentence. I will check back in to evaluate the progress being made, and I will compose my peer review when an appropriate amount of information has been added to this draft.

Lead: The lead section is set up very nicely, and provides a good summary of the rest of the article.

Content: After reading the original article, it is clear that the author is filling in an important gap in information. The original article included a lot of information about the effects of acid rain on the environment and organisms in the environment, but did not include much information on the effects of acid rain on humans. The information seems up to date, and the author did a good job of integrating the information into the existing article.

Tone and Balance: The content is very neutral and well-written. The content could seem that it is focusing on the negative effects of acid rain but since there are typically only negative effects to acidification, that is justified.

Sources and References: Most of the references are taken from research journals or government websites, and are recently published within the last 10 years.

Organization: The article is well organized and set up in an efficient manner. I would double check the grammar in some of your sentences to make sure that the sentences flow well, and are written in an intellectual manner.

Images and Media: There are no images or media added to the article.

Overall Impression: Overall, I think that this content has added valuable information to the original article. I think the strengths of your article are your lead section and the effects of these acids on humans. I might look into developing the federal government's recommendation section and making sure that it flows well with the rest of the article.