User:Dokung/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Visual communication)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The topic of the article has an interesting lead section / introduction which intrigued me to evaluate it. The article did not include a lot of visual elements- pictures and diagrams, which surprised me because the article is on visual communication. It is also a very relatable topic to me as I find myself to be a visual learner.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The introductory paragraph did an excellent job painting the scene of the next paragraphs to come. It is also very concise and informative, briefly stating every topic that would be expatiated on throughout the article.

The article is relevant and up to date to the topic- it dives into current and trending factors relating to the topic such as social media and the importance of visual communication in politics.

There is also no partial standpoint as to every issue or subtopic he will list a disadvantage and advantage to it when explaining it. (seen in visual aid media section) while also addressing underrepresented topics.

Adequate sources and references are included and are active links to the Wikipedia topics.

The article lacks images and can include a few more to bring more life and visual aid to the Wikipedia page.

The article succeeds as a Wikipedia article, it is easy to understand, has a simple layout and has no grammatical errors. It helps the readers fully grasp the topic, however, adding more current terms and instances to this day and generation would help it create a better visual experience to its readers.