User:Domino10101/Karen Cho/Peanutdoll Peer Review

General info
Domino10101/Karen Cho
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * In the lead section, the editor added a logical introduction to the director, including his birthplace and major works, and the content was very detailed. The introduction about the film might be more appropriate in the director's career section at the end. In the content part, the editor added very substantial and rigorous information, almost every sentence has its own source and provenance, and his attitude is neutral, the sentences used are also very objective, and reference sources are attached when telling a sentence, and there is a detailed introduction to each of the director's works, including conception and background.  The reference literature is very diverse, and the text is smooth, and the grammar is not a problem.  Overall, this is a very good Wikipedia entry, I became interested in this director and would like to see more works about her, thanks to this student's work.
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)