User:Domino10101/Karen Cho/Turquoisehell Peer Review

General info
Domino10101
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Domino10101/Karen Cho
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karen_Cho&action=edit&editintro=Template:BLP_editintro

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead is good, although it could be expanded to go beyond her film credits and give a brief overview of her life.

Content: The content is a great expansion of the article with significantly more detail regarding her life, education, work, and family than what was in the previously published article. The third paragraph under Career could be rewritten or even removed because it is repetitive of information already stated earlier in the article.

Tone: The tone appears very factual. No outlandish claims are made.

References: The added references are current and reflect what is being said in the article.

Images and Media: Her film credits are very well organized with tables. Images could be added to the article.

Overall Impression: I find this to be a solid improvement over the original article and other than small adjustments there is much more concise and clear information that is conveyed about Karen Cho.