User:Domoerlic123/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Media clip
 * Article Evaluation
 * After analyzing the wikipedia article Media clip, it was evident that the articles content was indeed relavent to the topic, although there was such little information presented. the surface level written article was written neutrally without a bias, and the few claims did include a citations, through the citations were not the most reliable. Taking a look at the talk page of the article, the article was rated Stub-Class and for its importance it was rated High-Importance with a list of suggestions that could help make the article a better red and more informative.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too. Sources
 * https://read.dukeupress.edu/poetics-today/article-abstract/25/1/67/20810
 * https://web.a.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=14646668&AN=24501441&h=%2b1DwCfuP7y3HMp4BA%2bIUhfVH%2bm86H%2f2jq57Eprpfft5sNL5%2ft4t6mCAvVc7uzituWuX5kDCr7eTuBKj7gox5lA%3d%3d&crl=c&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d14646668%26AN%3d24501441
 * https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/998041
 * Oroujlou, N. (2012). The Importance of Media in Foreign Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,51(C), 24-28.
 * https://sfu-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/15tu09f/01SFUL_ALMA21163143890003611

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Pasadena Star-News
 * Article Evaluation


 * Looking at the Pasadena Star-News wikipedia article, the content all stays on topic and keeps relevant to the discussion. The article gives a little more information the the previous article that I examined, though still just skims the surface of information on the subject. The articles is written neutrally without bias, with citations for the claims made within the article. Taking a closer look at the citations they seem to be informative and supporting the topic although I feel more reliable sources could be int]serted to make the article more informative. Looking at the talk page, no trace of conversation developed just the rating of Stub-Class alongside High -Importance and some recommendations on how to strengthen the articles integrity.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * http://www.fagellaw.com/documents/PasadenaStarNews-2-12-10.pdf
 * https://datacenterhub.org/resources/2122
 * SCHARNHORST, G. (2008). Julian Hawthorne's Contributions to the "Pasadena Star-News", 1923–1935. Resources for American Literary Study, 33, 95-132. Retrieved April 12, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/26367042
 * https://www.jstor.org/stable/26367042?seq=1
 * https://sfu-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/usv8m3/01SFUL_ALMA51188829540003611
 * https://sfu-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/usv8m3/01SFUL_ALMA51188829540003611

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Southern California News Group
 * Article Evaluation


 * The articles content is relevant to the topic of the wikipedia article Southern California News Group, the content of the article is once again surface level research and information. Though, it is written without bias from a neutral perspective the article lacks citations and the use of support for its claims. The talk page has little conversation discussing the confusion of the article, it is rated Stub-Class and High-Importance.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * https://idp.nature.com/authorize/casa?redirect_uri=https://www.nature.com/articles/356148a0&casa_token=4KuPNpEeU0YAAAAA:IAkPY4m3Q_FO43cj0LiFx2opX0_94zOz5nsCUgq3f-LtefL2SZ_IWXN6kjt_KUXfUkwM5bJUxGtjqlo
 * https://idp.nature.com/authorize/casa?redirect_uri=https://www.nature.com/articles/356148a0&casa_token=4KuPNpEeU0YAAAAA:IAkPY4m3Q_FO43cj0LiFx2opX0_94zOz5nsCUgq3f-LtefL2SZ_IWXN6kjt_KUXfUkwM5bJUxGtjqlo

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1995.tb00409.x?casa_token=wVJPoDcl7ZIAAAAA:bB0uKnPAb_Gej1QnUpZt8-3jjzM1qYaSDet8Mqo2AsknCmmKhXrquQKz_KiNgLrwkjQOiVjJNZSF2Q


 * https://sfu-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1u29dis/TN_doaj_soai_doaj_org_article_1c571dc299134faeb8351292c9ed2a76