User:Domoerlic123/Pasadena Star News/LeahJones13 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Domo Erlic123
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Domoerlic123/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * The lead has been updated and appears to have a more substantial lead to the article that sets a sturdy foundation for the rest of the article.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, it its concise and detailed enough to form a definition-like introductory phrase.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * There is a commentary about what is to come in the article, alongside a brief table of contents.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes, it discuses social media but does not go on to discuss this further.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is concise and to the point and provides an appropriate amount of detail.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * The content is extremely important to the topic and has built upon the previous author(s) work. Domo has done some much needed additions and fine-tuning to this article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes the content appears to be what is currently on the Pasadena-Star News' website and is current.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * There is a bit of discussion about social media in the lead, however, I believe it is not detrimental to the article and could be built upon over time and after the duration of this assignment.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * The content is neutral and is informative about the News agency's history in particular.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No there are no claims that appear heavily biased, it is more historical factual information being shared.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No there are no viewpoints that are over or under-represented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, this content is meant to inform.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, it is from the official Pasadena Star News Website.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes, it is reliable and provides detailed information.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, they are up to date and reflect recent events.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, the links take me straight to the source.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The information is all three of those things, alongside this, there is a very informative table that provides an overview of all the elements of the website of the Pasadena Star News.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Not that I came to notice.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, for a Stub-Class article, Domo has added very thoughtful additions to the page.

==== Organization evaluation: Overall, the article is well organized. Of course due to being a Stub-Class article there is room for additions but Domo has taken the lead and made the article much more informative and substantial. ====

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes, there is a logo that has been added which brings more understanding to the topic.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * The image is well-captioned and states exactly what it depicts.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes they do they are from within the CC search.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes, they are near the lead and add the creating a strong lead.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Overall, the content added by Domo appears essential to the page and is very well done.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * It is informative, well-researched, and is a meaningful addition.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * It could be improved by adding an addition supplementary reference to provide even more information.