User:Domtrimbur/Fishing/Sziegler4404 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Domtrimbur


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Domtrimbur/Fishing?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * History of fishing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

As I reviewed the original article and the edits that Domtrimbur made, I noticed that it was a strong article and overall not that many mistakes. The lead included a brief description of the articles major sections that included the history of fishing, fishing in the U.S, saltwater fishing, and the rest of the main topics that will soon have more detail later on. I also noticed that the sources were backed up by reliable sources and 2 of them were peer reviewed. I clicked on the links that led me to the sources as well and I could tell they are accurate just by looking at the web pages. I also checked to see if the sources he used were current and most of them are up-to-date and not from a long time ago. The article didn't include that many images but I can understand how it would be difficult to find images that describe the different types of fishing. But, the images that were displayed had captions that would describe which type of fishing people do during the year. There weren't any spelling errors but I noticed that some words were not supposed to be one word, so I fixed that. He also had captions for each section, this was really helpful because I can tell which information belongs where. Overall, this was a good edited article and the progress of Domtrimbur skills will only improve and strive for better success.