User:DonaldDuck808/Thylacodes variabilis/Kpaste Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * DonaldDuck808
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: :Editing User:DonaldDuck808/Thylacodes variabilis - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article:
 * Thylacodes variabilis - Wikipedia
 * Thylacodes variabilis - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!

'''The article includes information about the species and its family. It also discusses how and where the species is found and reproduces.'''
 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?

(Donald Duck 808 responding) Glad I got this part right. '''The author could find more sources with additional information. Also reorganizing the sections once there is more information.'''
 * 1) Check the main points of the article:
 * 2) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) Mentions the family, but primarily talks about the species.
 * 3) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) Will talk about the family a bit more then.
 * 4) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? There is only one section and the title is draft.
 * 5) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) I will change the title to my species and then add more sections.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? The information could be divided into at least three different sections.
 * 7) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) This will help me to know how to section my article. Thanks!
 * 8) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) I feel that the name of the family has a scientific name that could be used instead. Also, more scientific language could be used.
 * 9) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) I will be sure to use more scientific language.
 * 10) Check the sources:
 * 11) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Out of the three sentences, two are linked to sources.
 * 12) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) If it is necessary, I will link each sentence, even they are both under the same source.
 * 13) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? Yes.
 * 14) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) Nice.
 * 15) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes.
 * 16) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) Good.
 * 17) * What is the quality of the sources? The sources linked seem viable.
 * 18) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) Glad to hear it!
 * 19) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 20) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? I suggest adding more information. Along with creating different sections for said information.
 * 21) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) Will do.
 * 22) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? I do not believe this article is ready. There is a lot more information needed.
 * 23) * (Donald Duck 808 responding) I agree. I need more information.
 * 24) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

(Donald Duck 808 responding) Will change that.
 * 1) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?


 * I noticed the lack of scientific language. Along with the titling of sections.
 * (Donald Duck 808 responding) Will add scientific language to the titles.