User:Doni Devi Thingujam/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Environmental science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Environmental science is crucial as it focuses on understanding the interactions between the environment and development of organisms. It helps address environmental issues, such as pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion. By studying environmental science, we gain insights into sustainable practices and policies to protect and preserve the planet for future generations.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The introductory sentence is present and provides a concise description of the article's topic. The major sections of the article appear to cover the definition, history, terminology, and components of environmental science. The lead section is reasonably concise, providing a brief overview without excessive detail.

The content seems relevant to the topic of environmental science, covering its interdisciplinary nature, historical development, key events, and technological advancements. The article specifies the last update as the references are up-to date. This article does not indicate any missing content or information that doesn't belong. The article doesn't explicitly mention topics related to historically underrepresented populations.

The article is neutral in point of writing. It does not show evidence of bias at a particular position. The viewpoints are leading towards normal neither overrepresented nor underrepresented. The article is trying to describe the minor viewpoints very accurately. This article is completely balance to the reader.

All links of the citation work well. The sources provided in this article support whatever claim in this content. The references are reliable and authentic. The sources for this article are neutral not biased. The sources are from diverse authors and publications and up-to date.

In the talk page, the conversations are about the template and history. The comments are mostly focussed on confusion of representing the field of environmental science. The article lacks to present the scientific research informations. The article appears well-written and organized. It is not a part of wikiprojects. This article does not discuss well about the topics that we have learned in the class. This is more about general understanding of the environment but our class topics mostly considered the interactions of environment with living organisms and the effects on their developmental phenotypes.