User:Doompatrl/Evaluate A Source

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Lego

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose the article as Lego bricks have had a huge impact on my life, and I was curious to see what kind of article exists for it on Wikipedia. Lego is a large, well-known company that should have a reliable article for people across the web looking to find out about the company and its story. My first impression of the article was that it was thorough, clearly divided, and reliable, as the article has a lock at the top indicating that it is semi-protected.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section of the article is concise and includes important information, with the first sentence referencing the most important and useful points to learn what it—Lego—is. Content in the article is divided into clearly marked sections, with "main articles" referenced under the header of each section. There are many citations throughout the article, and insightful pictures added to each section. The tone remains neutral throughout, even when mentioning past scandals the company has been caught up in. Looking at the talk page, the article has been well rated, and undergone many important edits in the past. Cited articles have working links from reliable sources.