User:Doorleym1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Category:Chemistry

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate Chemistry because it is the scientific study for the behavior of science. This topic has a lot of value because it covers one of the world's main natural sciences. This subject is taught in almost every school, and it is a fundamental subject that every student must understand. It explains how the behavior of all matter in our world, which makes this a very important topic.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article covers information about the topic of chemistry. This article covers sections of Chemistry's Etymology, Modern Principles, History, and practice. The lead section is very concise and provides a general description of the topic as a whole. The lead does not add any details that are not present in the article.

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic, and there are not any distracting components. I believe that this article is up to date because it is a fundamental natural science that has been accepted as a science renaissance time period. It also includes the modern principles that apply to the subject, helping to add to its credibility.

The article's content is relevant to the topic because it contains all of its main aspects. It talks about the principles and the history behind chemistry. This topic is very neutral because it is presenting an objective point of view. This article does not address any misrepresented groups, it only presents information about the topic and its history.

This article seems to be completely neutral with no bias leaning toward any specific group. In the section with all the original chemists, from my perspective, it looks like they have included all of those that contributed to the formation of chemistry. The article does not try to convince the reader to lean in any direction with bias.

The article cites sources from the current era and from sources made over two hundred years ago. This includes a diverse amount of sources, which creates a more reliable article. After checking several of the links, they all lead to a reliable source with valuable information which is up to date.

The article is very easy to read, with no visible errors from my perspective. The topics are organized in an easy-to-read manner, which helps the audience understand the topic easier.

The article includes images that help the audience understand the description easier. Each visual image is cited correctly with an easy-to-understand caption. The images are placed in a visually pleasing formation, creating a better environment for readers.

This article has been ranked as a level-2 vital article and it is a C-Class in the WikiProject category. There has been an edit request for the Electrons section, trying to discuss the topic of electron clouds.

Overall, this topic is a very reliable article that is highly ranked by Wikipedia. It is fully developed and presents a lot of valuable information on the topic of chemistry.