User:Dorkorama/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
The File on H.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it's on a book we read in class, making it an obvious candidate, and it's a class S article, meaning there's no shortage of topics within the article for me to expand on. My impression was that the article was well written, but extremely short.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is extremely short, and does not cover the content in the main article. The article is clearly a stand-in for a much needed expansion, lacking content in its sections, seemingly inaccurate plot descriptions, and very little surrounding information. It maintains a neutral point of view and expresses multiple viewpoints fairly. It has just two pictures, and could use more. The talk space has some major criticisms of the novel, though it seems not to have been edited since 2006.

Overall, the article is quite poorly developed and needs significant expansion.