User:Dorsanil/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title:Human science
 * Article Evaluation:Content: The information provided in the article is relevant to the article's topic and is not distracting from the main idea. The article was last edited in 2023 and is up-to-date. No apparent information was missing, and no notable equity gaps were observed. Tone: The article could be improved with the addition of more information on the subject and more references. The article is neutral, and the claims are not biased, so all viewpoints presented are equally presented. Sources: The links and citations presented are valid. The sources support the claims in the article. Although there is not much information, the information presented is properly referenced and comes from neutral sources with a diverse array of authors.  Talk page: A few discussions have been started on the talk page of this article. The article is rated start-class and does not fall within the scope of Wiki Projects. However, it has been nominated for merging with social science.
 * Sources:Dreyfus, H. L. (2011). Medicine as Combining Natural and Human Science. JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 36(4), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhr027 Sampaio, R. (2018). Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences. KAIROS-JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY & SCIENCE, 20(1), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0004 Smith, R. (2005). Does reflexivity separate the human sciences from the natural sciences? HISTORY OF THE HUMAN SCIENCES, 18(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695105058468

Option 2

 * Article title:Gender studies
 * Article Evaluation:Content: The information provided in the article is relevant to the article's topic and is not distracting from the main idea. The article was last edited in 2023 and is up-to-date. No apparent information was missing, and notable equity gaps were observed. Tone: The article could be improved with the addition of more information on the subject and more references. The article is neutral, and the claims are not biased, so all viewpoints presented are equally presented. Sources: The links and citations presented are valid. The sources support the claims in the article. Although there is not much information, the information presented is properly referenced and comes from neutral sources with a diverse array of authors.  Talk page: A few discussions have been started on the talk page of this article. The article is rated C-class and falls within the scope of gender studies, sexology and sexuality, and philosophy, Wiki Projects.
 * Sources:Franz Hoppen, N. H., & de Souza Vanz, S. A. (2020). What are gender studies: Characterization of scientific output self-named gender studies in a multidisciplinary and international database. ENCONTROS BIBLI-REVISTA ELETRONICA DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 25. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e71677 Nagalia, S. (2018). Conceptualising Gender Studies: Curriculum and Pedagogy. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENDER STUDIES, 25(1), 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521517738452 Pulkkinen, T. (2015). Identity and Intervention: Disciplinarity as Transdisciplinarity in Gender Studies. THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 32(5–6), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415592683  Sato, F. (2021). Trends in gender studies within Japanese sociology. INTERNATIONAL SOCIOLOGY, 36(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809211005353

Option 3

 * Article title:Clinical physiology
 * Article Evaluation:Content: The information provided in the article is relevant to the article's topic and is not distracting from the main idea. The article was last edited in 2023 and is up-to-date. No apparent information was missing, and no notable equity gaps were observed. Tone: The article could be improved with the addition of more information on the subject and more references. The article is neutral, and the claims are not biased, so all viewpoints presented are equally presented. Sources: The links and citations presented are valid. The sources support the claims in the article. Although there is not much information, the information presented is properly referenced and comes from neutral sources. However, the articles do not have a diverse array of authors.  Talk page: A few discussions have been started on the talk page of this article. The article is rated start-class and low-importance and falls within the scope of Medicine Wiki Projects.
 * Sources:Laitinen, T., Sovijarvi, A., Malmberg, P., Turjanmaa, V., & Hartiala, J. (2022). The birth and development of clinical physiology in Finland. CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 42(3), 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12749 Micoulaud-Franchi, J.-A., Dumas, G., Quiles, C., & Vion-Dury, J. (2017). From clinic to the “foul and exciting field of life”: A psychiatric point of view on clinical physiology. ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 175(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2016.11.004 Satoh, M., Fujimura, A., & Miyagawa, S. (2023). Difficulties and innovations in teaching anatomy and physiology in nursing. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 67, 103551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103551