User:Dorsanil/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Clinical research ethics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I selected this article because it is relevant to a paper I am currently working on. It is important as it covers the topics of ethics and science and the relationship between the two. My preliminary impression of the article was that I was uncertain of its credibility, as there was not much reference provided. That said, there was not much information provided either, therefore, the credibility could be argued.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Using the criteria presented in the Evaluate Wikipedia training module to evaluate this article:

Content: The information provided in the article is relevant to the article's topic and is not distracting from the main idea. However, the article was last edited in 2021 and may be out of date. No apparent information was missing, and no notable equity gaps were observed.

Tone: The article could be improved with the addition of more information on the subject and more references. The article is neutral, and the claims are not biased, so all viewpoints presented are equally presented.

Sources: The links and citations presented are valid. The sources support the claims in the article. Although there is not much information, the information presented is properly referenced and comes from neutral sources with a diverse array of authors.

Talk page:

No discussions have been started on the talk page of this article. The article is rated start-class, mid-important, and low-importance and falls within the scope of WikiProject Medicine and WikiProject Philosophy. There is no discussion on this topic, which therefore cannot be compared to the way we have talked about it in class.