User:Dproland/sandbox

bold

'Article Evaluation
I chose to evaluate the First five-year plan article. Each content section seemed to be relevant to the topic and the contents under each section seemed to be relevant to that section as well as to the entire article. The article appears to be neutral in its stance toward the first year plan and nothing seems to be over represented. Most of the citations that I checked linked to reliable sources that seemed to be scholarly texts or information that was neutral. There were some citations that led me to an area where I could not check the direct reference, or the reference in the citation section was not clear on which area of the book, website the information came from. There are definitely some sections that are missing citations that will need to be fact checked then citations will need to be added. There is definitely information that could be added, this is a big topic regarding Russia's history and much more could be covered in each section. The talk page does mention some additional facts as well as the fact that there could be more information added because some of the sections seem a bit rushed. And also a comment about certain issues being glossed over, however I do not think that anything was glossed over in a biased way, as mentioned prior it just seems as though things ere added in pieces and not thoroughly. This article is part of the WikiProjects. Because Wikipedia is a neutral platform and allows anyone to edit appropriately there are things discussed that we don't necessarily bring up in class, also in class we tend to have more opinions about a certain subject then what you will find on this page.