User:Dqp5391/Chief technology officer/Sxl79 Peer Review

Peer review
For this peer review, I'm reviewing the chief technology officer from the DQP5391

Chief technology officer

Lead
I think the lead is perfect. It well-explain the general introduction about the technology.

It gives the basic knowledge about the background and concise description about the topic.

However, it does not have the introduction about the section of the article.

Content
The content only requires three parts of this topic. To be concise, it only contains two parts. I think there should be more about to the topic.

Yes, the content is up-to-date, I can see that the resources are from 2019, which is close to the time now.

I think there are more information that can be added to this topic.

Tone and Balance
Yes, all article looks neutral. They did not put any personal idea into the website. It talks more about the overview of the officer.

The balance looks perfect. They did not include a lot of things in the website. Yet, things in the website look fine.

Sources and References
Yes, all the secondary source looks reliable. It does not contain the personal blog or other unofficial website.

The links work, and there are a lot from the research website, which means that the website is neutral and professional.

Organization
The organization is well-written, especially for the overview part. It is clear and easy to read.

Even though there are lots of information in it, the paragraph is easy to understand.

I can understand easily what they want to deliver, but I think the overview part can breakdown to another sections.

Images and Media
It does not have a lot of images. The only image is the officer of the chief technology.

It is well-captioned by a single section, so I think it's adhere to the copyright regulations.