User:Dr.MeowMeow/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Charizard

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it interests me. It matters because further generation of nerds will be curious as to who charizard was. They will want to understand how this seemingly regular pokemon has been a key mascot ofthe billion dollar company. My preliminary impression of the article was that it does a very good job at being accurate but it does not have the best grammar.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

There is a very good lead. They very clearly explain what charizard is, as well as where it comes from. The content is well versed and in depth but it clearly has not been updated to current status. There has been information completely left out with relating to current games. The tone is very clearly neutral with no special bias given to charizard as a character or subject. The article is clear and concise for the most part but lacks proper grammar in the intro paragraph. It often repeats itself when not needed. I think that the images used are clear and well captioned. However the article can clearly benefit from more images showing the different forms of charizard. My overall opinion on the article is that it is very clear in the history and subject of said charizard. The article's grammar could be imporved by deleting repeated statements. Otherwise it is very clear and flows well with a neutral view. The article would also benefit from more images.