User:Dr.Nur

Thak you Dr. Nur for your message. I agree with you completely and as I said once, the history of Arabia should be re-written without hurting the "feelings" of the vicims of European Horrors. Further, the re-writing of the Arabian history entails the emergence of Arabic as the Language of God, the Hebrew is a nomenclature of the Old Arabic that was created in the Babylonian captivity. Modern Hebrew therefore is a written-read language, just like it has always been the Temple Language encrusted in the scrolls and mastered by only the priests, not the people. Therefore, the people spoke the common Arabic, which the Biblical Scholars call "Hebrew" or "the other language", just to make the people of Israel a distinct category from the common Arabs.

Finally, I advocate that the people of Palestine by the time of Jesus spoke the common Arabic including Jesus himself, along with the Jews as well. The written language was always different from the spoken language. This applies to the Kuran as well because I believe that the Divine Language has always been ABOVE the Arabian common intellect.

Theoretically, when a language is written, it stops from evolving and changing. That is what happened to the Old Arabic written by the Israelites. For the lettering, the "hebrew" alphabet was created in Babylon. The initial Arabic was what the historians call "Phoenician". Yes, Phoenicians were Arabs. Think Enoch, Think Moses and please answer back.

Respectfully, --Noureddine (talk) 13:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)