User:Dr. Blofeld/September 2014

DYK for Zorlu Center
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Jacques Guay
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi
If you find time for it please take a look at the articles Martina Montelius, Athena Farrokhzad, Victor Hartman, Helena Quiding and Lilla Skuggan when you got time for it. Appreciate it! :)--BabbaQ (talk) 21:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Len Rawle
Len Rawle, player and preserver of organs of the Wurlitzer variety. I've just been re-watching Metro-Land and wonder whether Rawles might be notable. Pathé covered him in 1960, there are bits such as this and he is already mentioned in Wurlitzer theatre organs in the United Kingdom. He has been interviewed here (I cannot hear it) and there are loads of other GHits, although many are unfamiliar to me and a fair few seem to be basically PR for concerts. There is also a hint in a snippet about what he had to do to his self-built house feature in Metro-Land in order to get the former Empire Cinema, Leicester Sq. organ into it and not annoy the neighbours. It will be a stub but there are enough snippets to suggest that more might turn up. What do you think? It isn't really my line and I'm limited on time at the moment but perhaps someone might take it on? - Sitush (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Don you mean Metroland (film)? ♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes. - Sitush (talk) 09:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Metro-Land (TV film) actually. I've stubbed Len Rawle.♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'm likely to be gone from WP for a few days and, in any case, you're better at creating stubs than me. - Sitush (talk) 14:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * It's a good one as it rooted out a missing notable landmark in my home town, Barry Memorial Hall !♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for John McFarlane Gray
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Metropolis
The New York Times critic review under the Reception section needs a citation. The Newspapers.com resource might help us. Meanwhile, I have found a good source for adding other facts.--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

I have added a few references for the facts under the popular culture section. For the rest I could not find sources.--Skr15081997 (talk) 14:17, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

I'd actually removed the entire section but its page OWNer reverted me. A bulleted list of trivia is NOT accpetable.At best it should be a paragraph of sourced written material of the most notable associations.♦  Dr. Blofeld  14:24, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I have removed the unsourced facts and changed the bulleted list into a paragraph.--Skr15081997 (talk) 15:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm Jeffrd10. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barry_waterfront&diff=624020674&oldid=143113069 this edit] to Barry waterfront, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * sorry about that I must have misclick well using vada.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Re; Barry Waterfront
Will get going on this shortly ;) We hope (talk) 17:02, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, but I don't see any they describe as garages? We hope (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Got it! Over here, it's a gas station, more often than not combined with a convenience store. :) We hope (talk) 19:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Chopin
Hi! Just to let you know that Frederic is up for TFA for his 165th birthday! Best, --Smerus (talk) 20:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Barry Waterfront
Lol the Focus store photo caption, but I'd tweak it to: Focus, DYK, focus! ;) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

I'll do a bit more on this one tonight or tomorrow and get it nomd. --Rosiestep (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Whoa... archaeological site... Let me see if I can put my thumbprint on Atlantic Trading Estate before it's nomd. --Rosiestep (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

You might be interested in this. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Barry Waterfront
 * added links pointing to David Davies, Halford and Redrow


 * Len Rawle
 * added a link pointing to Kilburn


 * Rep (television series)
 * added a link pointing to John Fraser

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Populated places in Lochalsh
Category:Populated places in Lochalsh, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Modesta Avila
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

List of Chola Temples in Bangalore
Hi, this might interest you. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 18:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Not sure what I can do with it, seems more like Nvvchar's cup of tea but he's not active on here now.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Mr Bigglesworth ate Jimbo's beard
I have no idea what that was all about but it gave me a chuckle. 28bytes (talk) 20:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

I let the cat edit wiki while I was off watching Things to Come! A mighty fine performance by Ralph Richardson, not sure if has seen it.♦  Dr. Blofeld  20:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Hee Hee
Just saw this and had to chuckle. My one pleasant memory of the film is that I saw it at our Cooper Cinerama Theatre. As a youngster it seemed to make any film a extraordinary experience. Just shows how wonderfully naive a person can be. If the legend that Howard Hughes watched it over and over is true that alone would show he was off his rocker :-) I am working my way through a nice Bluray set of Werner Herzog's early films and Thursday night was Aguirre, the Wrath of God. It is a true journey into the "Heart of Darkness" film. The opening sequence is stunning and it, as well as his other film made in the Amazon forest Fitzcarraldo, are worth your time. His remake of Murnau's Nosferatu - Nosferatu the Vampyre is also worth a look - if only for the fact that some scenes were filmed at the same spots. WH captures nature and magnificent scenery like few others and all three of these films have great examples of this. I know you are busy busy watching all manner of films so keep having fun - whenever possible - doing that. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Roger Ebert's review of the film is absolutely spot on!! I really wanted to like it, generally I enjoy Rock Hudson films, but aside from a few nice shots of the frozen ocean, the snow and Borgnine spurring on Jim Brown to hit him with a crowbar I honestly can't see what on earth they were thinking in making it!! Actually Aguirre is already near the top of my to watch list and I spotted the remake of Nosferatu in my 1001 movies book. Olympia and The Bakers' Wife from 1938 I think is all I have left now and then I'll have seen almost all the films in the book up to 1956!... I've long been looking forward to tackling such European masterpieces of the 60s and 70s of which the book has many... ♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Big feature films of the era often had a program that you could by in the lobby. I think I still have the one for ISZ in a box somewhere. Now the memory is hazy and this is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH on my part but I think Hollywood thought that turning Alistair MacLean novels into films was a money making proposition in the 60's and 70s. While The Guns of Navarone and Where Eagles Dare are on my favorite "Adventure films" list the others are so-so films and most don't match up to the books very well. Thanks for the link to Ebert's review. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 22:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

, I saw Aguirre and Fitzcarraldo earlier. Excellent films! Kinski was such a psychopath, you could tell that he was a very difficult man! You could really feel the genuine tension and hatred by the natives of Kinski in Fitzcarraldo. You can't fake that!!♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Glad you enjoyed them. The documentary My Best Fiend shows how correct you are about KK. The story is that he was in 130 some odd films and the only director he worked with more that once is Herzog. I haven't fact checked that though. Now that you've seen F you might want to check out Burden of Dreams if it is available to you. Have a good week. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 20:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Skagen Painters
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Launching the Boat. Skagen
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Will He Round the Point?
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Sunlight in the Blue Room
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Summer Evening at Skagen Beach – The Artist and his Wife
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Midsummer Eve Bonfire on Skagen Beach
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for The North Sea in Stormy Weather
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

2011 UK Census
Local data by postcode I can't get any further than this as I don't have a postcode. :) It looks like you can get more details from the official site if you enter the postcode of the area you're interested in. We hope (talk) 12:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Aangan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aangan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aangan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Keswick
The demographics section is now safely added, I see. I am once again in your debt, Doctor. I need one last rummage in the local archives (a fortnight hence) to deal with a question raised by two peer reviewers about the continuity, if any, between the old and the new grammar school, and then it will be time to go to FAC, I think. I trust you will agree to be co-nom?  Tim riley  talk    17:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Yup, that would be great, I think straight to FAC would be more productive. I might just have a look through google books and Highbeam myself just to see if there's anything else which can be added but it's definitely in good shape. BTW, have you seen Things to Come? A mighty fine performance by Mr Richardson...♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I have, and what with RR's perf and Bliss's superb music it's a very fine effort.  Tim riley  talk    19:14, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Ernst Plassmann
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  00:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your eyes are requested at...
Ernst Stavro Blofeld, where a substantial deletion was made. I have no opinion (no expertise on the subject matter). Ahem, thought you may. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Missing
Good suggestion. I went through my list of 2014 new articles (almost 100% being translations from other lang Wikipedias) and added the women writers bios to the WOMENWRI project page. Hopefully it inspires others. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Query on map functionality
Recalling this map change, I was wondering if there is functionality to have two maps or if one map can be inset in the other. I see a lot of inset maps on WP and don't know how to do it.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Infobox settlement has a multiple pin map option. If you want the building template to have one (which I'd support) I'd ask User:Plastikspork or User:Frietjes.♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. I have contacted both User:Plastikspork and User:Frietjes. I guess we now just watch Infobox building and see if either of them can help.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * seems to be willing to make something happen. However, due to the extensive use of the template, he wants a consensus to be formed regarding the ultimate final format. At User_talk:Frietjes, he has presented the various cartographic possibilities. Personally, I don't think a reader should have to get by with less than 3 or 4 of the map options that he has presented. E.g., Chicago has three maps and that is quite useful. Something in a neighborhood within Chicago should have a 4th map as well. Thus, a building like Broadway Hollywood Building or any other building would better serve the reader if we could present 3 or 4 maps. I would not be averse to all 5 maps that we have for that building. How did Infobox settlement come to their multi pin map consensus? Where was the discussion held and when? Where should the discussion on this be held?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Agustí Riera i Pau
New article. I do not speak a word of Spanish (& it is not my work), but I tried to fix the citations. I don't want to mess up this new editor's work. Interesting article. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 00:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

A bit rough around the edges yeah, but seems mostly OK.♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Tweaked it more. Thanks.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 10:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Archiving
Hi. Can I ask for your help? I put the archive template at the top of my talk page like I was supposed to. But nothing is happening. What have I done wrong? Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Really appreciate the help Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Help with article title
Hi, just created Hind Kesari from Homi Wadia Template and realised have the title as Hind[i] Kesari (Hindi Kesari) instead of Hind Kesari! Need to remove the i from the end of Hind in the title. Can you help? I don’t want to move it myself as last time I moved an article there was a problem. Thanks. Kaayay (talk) 12:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Jaws is dead! :(
hello Blofeld it may interest you to know that Richard Kiel (Jaws) Has passed away, his metallic grin will be missed.-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender 10:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

I know, see User talk:SchroCat.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Watermarks
File:Punjab Mail 1939 film.jpg This is now at Graphics Lab/Photography workshop. This one File:Amar Raj 1946.jpg was easy-found an unmarked copy. :) We hope (talk) 13:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Any of these of interest? We hope (talk) 14:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

All of them yeah! I love looking at old Bollywood film posters! They're all public domain I believe. Pre 1954 film posters of the 50s too. And with Kaayay it seems we're trying to cover every film :-). I believe there's a lot of "fair use" posters on here for 40s films when they're actually public domain.♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Pinterest has helped me out more than once when looking for larger copies of posters and lobby cards. It does look like they're all PD--nothing like one stop shopping, right? :) We hope (talk) 14:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Great find! And some are a good resolution too! Only upload some though if you feel like it! If you do upload any and they don't have articles I'll see what I can do :-) This for instance would be helpful as Kaayay as just expanded it!♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * File:Bambaiwali 1941.jpg Here you go. If you find we have posters here that aren't licensed as PD, I think another copy would need to be uploaded to Commons because I doubt we have a PD-india template.  If we do, using it here would probably set off some false bells & whistles. :) Guess they need to go to Commons and then have the non free file deleted from here. We hope (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * That's great thanks. Basically if you can spot any by Template:Homi Wadia that would help! Lutaru Lalna I couldn't find one for.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Does this look like it's right? We hope (talk) 16:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yup, that's it!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps and  could provide some input on the deletion  !♦  Dr. Blofeld  15:40, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Editor par excellence
Thanks, until Mr Bigglesworth has a paddy that is :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

2014 in chess
This should be an article, not a disambiguation page (see WP:DABCONCEPT). Use 2013 in chess as a model. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for A Dog's Love
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Rise and Fall of the Romanov Autocracy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Rise and Fall of the Romanov Autocracy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Rise and Fall of the Romanov Autocracy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.


 * I get a complete blank on this apart from a few mentions in Clive Mantle bios. No author, description, date, TV channel. Nothing. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Atlantic Trading Estate
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!
And thankyou for the great starter articles!!! Keep up the good work!!♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=625670192 your edit] to List of American films of 1944 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * |Goodnight, Sweetheart|| [Joseph Santley]||Robert Livingston, Ruth Terry, Henry Hull ||  Musical comedy||

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=627543095 your edit] to Province of Sassari may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * ] and others. Stintino is located on the peninsula of the same name, running from the Nurra plain  to  the Asinara Island, part of the Asinara National Park. Among the

Lists of Mexican films
List of Mexican films of 1980 plus others in the Mexico cat, done. Any other countries with the same caps issue? --Rosiestep (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ganga puja for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ganga puja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ganga puja until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kevin McE (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased)
As you are the lead editor on the above I was surprised that you changed Randall & Hopkirk (Deceased) to Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) when the title card is clearly &. Many lnks now come by redirects. I did mention on the talk page it was correct first time but no other comment has been made. REVUpminster (talk) 07:36, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure it matters, although I have no objection if you want to move to &. The real problem was the 2000 series not being (2000 series). As far as I can see the title card says "and". "And" is probably more suitable for an encyclopedia and in searches anyway than &.♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of O Trem da Morte for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O Trem da Morte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/O Trem da Morte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kevin McE (talk) 11:07, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Shall I update your user page from "I edit wikipedia" to "I edit wikipedia, but I'm far too lazy to be bothered to expand articles".♦  Dr. Blofeld  11:43, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Alternatively, you could make sure that articles you create have some reason to exist. Don't make personal attacks. Kevin McE (talk) 11:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

The stub was perfectly legitimate and contained info on the director, cast and release date. Do you honestly expect me to write a full length article on a Brazilian film from the 1920s?? Sources are in Portuguese. Do you not think that the stub was a step in the right direction in trying to tackle systematic bias? I'm not criticising you for wanting these stubs improved, but it is worrying to me that you're not bothering to look in google books to see if it is notable or not, and that you wouldn't even consider asking an editor courteously to expand. If you don't want "personal attacks", stop aggressively nominating every short article you see for deleti.on.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:59, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Drive by taggers and now drive by deleters —My favorite tag for use by ill-advised editors
I thought we were trying to build the world's greatest encyclopedia, not tear it down. I am disheartened by those who choose not to even try to improve articles before tagging them for deletion. Big prospective waste of time and a squandering of already expended effort. Sigh. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 16:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm not criticising editors for going through articles who want to see general quality improved. But if you want an article deleted from the encyclopedia purely for being short without bothering to search and prove there's no sources then that really isn't a good thing. It's lazy and irresponsible. And if they know deep down it's notable but are nominating them to get them improved, if they simply asked me to expand something they'd be just as likely to get results.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't bother further, the editor is obviously not interested in listening. He's been informed so more AFD's of this type should be seen as disruptive. --Neil N  talk to me 19:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thankfully he's not around much throughout the year... But if he plans on doing so it's not going to be long before he's blocked.♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:18, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Sod this
Copied comment here as Kevin will no doubt remove my message from his talk page:

Kevin says: "I used to contribute a lot here. I haven't so much recently, but having some recuperation time with limited mobility, I thought I would do some random article hopping, and try to improve the errors that I come across as a reader of Wikipedia that make it look amateurish.  But the extraordinary incivility and bullying that I encountered makes me regret that choice.

This project could be great if there weren't so such aggressive and arrogant defenders of their own right to retain pointless uninformative stubs that fail to meet even the barest requirements. As it is, it is good despite them, but something I have a lot less interest in than 48 hours ago". Kevin McE (talk) 14:28, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

This project would be great if everybody worked together and supported each other and instead of trying to delete everything lacking, worked together in good spirit to improve them and benefit the encyclopedia in the long term. Not running straight to AFD on every short article you encounter without even bothering to search for sources and improve it yourself. You only have yourself to blame with your callous approach to articles and lack of respect for other editors and consensus. I've told you that you're welcome to kindly ask me to ask something you don't like. Nobody is defending pointless uninformative stubs, we're defending them as encyclopedia subjects which with a bit of research can quickly be turned into something really decent. If you can't see this and respect the goals of the project, then wikipedia is far better off without you, so adios. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * This fungal-like invasion of what's laughingly known as "civility" here on WP is deeply embedded. The really strange thing is that those in charge, from Jimbo down, just can't see the damage it's done, and is doing. Indeed, so misguided are they that they can't even understand that they've identified the wrong targets to be shown the door. Eric   Corbett  20:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Yeah, you never see Jimbo and co complaining about people like Kevin who are too lazy to research articles and are trying to delete everything. That they think "incivility" is far more damaging than editors who regularly try to delete actual content is quite worrying.. It's an encyclopedia at the end of the day and deleting articles without a single attempt to find sources is far more damaging to the project than any "arrogant, aggressive" retort somebody could make.♦  Dr. Blofeld  22:10, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Owl Drug Company
Hello! Your submission of The Owl Drug Company at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Time now for a DYK
Aw thanks. Wikipedia is full of incompetent little twats though. We have to deal with this sort of thing all of the time! Shuttlecock is a tough one, I'm still not certain on when the exact release was and what happened. Given that Alan Bates hasn't been alive for at least 10 years, this looks like the same film under a different title.♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:35, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * So is it that you think personal attacks should be allowed, or that you think you should be allowed to do it what you haven't even had the courtesy to talk to me rather than about me? Kevin McE (talk) 11:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

It isn't a personal attack though is it, as it isn't directed at anybody.... It's a general comment about the number of incompetent individual wikipedia attracts. A personal attack would be "Kevin McE is a f**king wanker. What a twat that fella is". I said nothing of the sort.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Incompetent cliques of bullies too. Let the subliterate crap on this project fester then.  Kevin McE (talk) 12:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * There's plenty of those too! If you don't want to be bullied, don't come pestering me with silly deletion tags and things will run a lot sweeter for you. No, the idea is to turn the subliterate crap into something useful, rather than completely delete everything.. As I said, I'm not criticising you for going through categories or whatever and finding inadequate articles badly in need of improvement, but if you want an article expanded, you're more than welcome to ask me kindly to expand it, or expand it yourself.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:18, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

African film awards
Did you have anything planned with this? I know our coverage on here for African films is pretty bad, and I'd be happy to help to counter systematic bias! If you've got any good sources to use, I can start creating articles. This isn't just limited to Africa too - let me know what country/directors are missing key articles too. Thanks!  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 11:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

I can't think of any African ones offhand. The one which springs to mind though is Luiz de Barros for Brazil, a lot of notable films missing if you're interested. The African film award list is a work in progress...♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:57, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Colcot
 * added a link pointing to Westbourne


 * List of American films of 1910
 * added a link pointing to George Nichols


 * Otselic, New York
 * added a link pointing to Fisher


 * Shuttlecock (film)
 * added a link pointing to John Petersen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

O Trem da Morte
Hi, Dr. Blofeld. Sorry for the delay. I was in a hurry when I read your message. I'll give it a shot now. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Barry Docks
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:17, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Joseph Farcot
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:03, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

St John's GA
You've probably seen it but St John's Church, Manchester has just got its GA rating. I think that's probably the fastest new article-to-GA that I've had any involvement in. Thanks for all your help with that. It still needs work, though! - Sitush (talk) 17:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Excellent work! It helps if you have a great reviewer of course who don't make reviews last for weeks like some on here... ♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * In fairness, sometimes reviews need to take weeks. If an article is obviously good but not quite Good, and in particular if the nominator/primary writer/whatever is one of those people who tend to dig their heels in, then things drag on. I actually admire the persistence of some reviewers, given that they could just throw their hands up and step away. - Sitush (talk) 18:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * No review at least for GA really needs to take weeks. Peer reviews and FACs which require multiple reviewers and a wealth of comments and time needed to address, then of course weeks are needed. A lot of people are put off from contributing to GA because of excessive reviews.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:27, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Perhaps I've been lucky, then. Assuming that I'm not blocked or sitebanned in the next few hours, I will have the pleasure of the FAC people soon when I send William Beach Thomas there. However, I've enlisted the help of the one-man FAC outfit prior to nominating, so that should smooth things quite a lot. - Sitush (talk) 18:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Indian film posters
ended happily as "keep", so it looks like the other Pinterest posters would be fine to upload as long as they're within the 60 year Indian PD time frame. We hope (talk) 20:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Glad to hear it!♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Geography Barnstar
How do you schedule time for breathing? Just curious. lol --Rosiestep (talk) 14:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Ok; I'll look at them after work tonight. --Rosiestep (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

I do not wish to be Sybil you toffee nosed snobs!
I'm gonna give this wiki the thrashing of a lifetime! (Whacks wikipedia with a tree branch)-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender 18:08, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

No personal attacks, even physical ones!! I've taken you to ANI and you will be blocked!♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

what about silly walks?-- Lerd the nerd wiki defender 18:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

I don't know, ask the Rambler's Association :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for The Owl Drug Company
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

montage
Let me start working on it. Question-what about someone not wanting to be Civil? :) We hope (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Please do not resort to personal attacks. You'll be blocked for insybility! :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Guadalajara montage.jpg See if you like these photos. See-I'm being Sybil and Civil at the same time. Not easy as you wear 2 sets of clothes... :) We hope (talk) 16:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

That'll be OK, thanks Sybil!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Image on cy
Many thanks for this edit, which I'm sure makes sense; but why? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

I wasn't sure whether to tag it as a vio from S4C or whether it was genuinely an original. It needed a license. I didn't upload it to the commons because I wasn't convinced it was copyright free. I saved Caryl Parry Jones earlier and translated a bit from Welsh, with google assistance, even though I'm Welsh I don't understand much!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Barry Waterfront
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Fredrik Belfrage for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fredrik Belfrage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fredrik Belfrage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 22:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monirith Chhea


The article Monirith Chhea has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. William Thweatt TalkContribs 04:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Almazán
 * added links pointing to Alfonso I and Alfonso VI


 * Brades
 * added a link pointing to Burger


 * Namibe Province
 * added a link pointing to Herero


 * Province of Caserta
 * added a link pointing to Sora


 * Şırnak Province
 * added a link pointing to Asat

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Double-hulled tanker
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  00:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Paris
I filed an SPI yesterday. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:52, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, it's been ridiculous. I can't believe not one administrator here can ask people from skyscrapers.com to refrain from creating new accounts to try to force an urban image at Talk:Paris. So many situations which should have been dealt with swiftly have been allowed to continue on here because of the lack of intervention. I appreciate that people are busy but it does sort of defeat the object of having them if still new accounts are being created to stack votes. At least an admin should leave a notice at the top of the talk page saying  "This is not a vote. If you've been ask to create a new account on wikipedia with the sole purpose of voting for an image then your input will likely be discredited."♦  Dr. Blofeld  10:57, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Stub contest
Just to let you know that as of tonight you're in second place, with 665 points. I think you've got the oldest stub declared so far, as well...

I noticed you've been leaving a running total which is currently at 765, but I make it 665 - could you check this? It's quite possible that I've made my provisional count wrong, thanks to all the various multipliers - I'll double-check them all before we declare a winner, just to be sure. Andrew Gray (talk) 20:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

I just did a count and I got 745 that time. Did you also count the flat 10 points for the entries themselves aside form the bonuses? Perhaps can double check.Does the contest end at 23:59 on 30 September right and whoever has the most points is the winner?♦  Dr. Blofeld  20:36, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok - hang on. just running out the door. back on soon. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Figured it out - my fault! I'd put a typo in the +10 score modifiers and so kept summing them up wrong. Now recounted from scratch as 755 total (260+200+150+110+15), back into a (narrow) lead... I'll run through the other high scorers just now and check I haven't made the same mistake twice. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * That seems about right. Yeah I'd thought Skr had nearer 1000 points by now! I think though I've tackled more 35 pointers than him. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Skr is confirmed as 720 + one pending (but only a ten-pointer) - close enough that it's a one-article margin, really! You've been getting slightly more 35-pointers, but he's still got the only perfect 45-pointer I've noticed... Andrew Gray (talk) 21:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * He had a massive head start!! Before I even noticed there was a contest he'd already expanded half of the +1200 ones!! Can you just confirm, the contest ends at 23:59 GMT on 30 Sept right?♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:12, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I had assumed midnight UTC but I've just noticed we haven't actually said a time zone anywhere on the page, and not sure how we ran it last time! Will poke Cas & Mitch for a ruling. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:28, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I think GMT midnight is probably fairer. Otherwise by the time I've gone to bed somebody in California has another 8 hours odd to expand entries!!♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Right - have just driven 80 km and now freezing my proverbials off while my daughter is practicing with her ice skating team...brrrrrrrr. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Midnight UTC it is (note that this is technically 1am BST - we haven't changed back to GMT yet! - so you get a bonus hour of late-night editing). All contributions have to be made by this time but there'll be a few days grace period for actually submitting them to the contest page. Will update it just now - thanks for querying this! Andrew Gray (talk) 21:59, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

You're involved in a case raised in the noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Metropolitan (talk) 21:47, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

You're an even sadder character than I thought.... The time it took you to find all of those diffs and try to portray us the bad party is disgusting. You clearly do not have the best interests in the project at heart and aren't here to be constructive. I suggest an admin swiftly close the ANI post as nothing is going to come from it...♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Seriously, what do you expect if you go canvassing a bunch of meat puppets from skyscrapers.com to force your agenda here? Given that you never edit wikipedia constructively and only turn up every so years to complain, why do you think people were "uncivil" to you? I see you as just another of those excruciatingly annoying time wasters who do nothing for the site but waste the precious time of regulars. Please leave.♦ Dr. Blofeld  06:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * This is getting more than silly, isn't it? But do try to tone it down a bit (I'm referring to beyond here ; ) <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:85%;text-shadow:1px 1px 3px #a0a0a0;">THE PROMENADER  08:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I think I've been very conservative with what I've said given the circumstances. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Just to lighten the humour a bit, I don't suppose you can find a picture so we can do something about the Manuel of Style?

"Mr Fawlty, Mr Fawlty, is WP:RS! Is WP:RS!"

"IS NOT WP:RS. IS ONLY BLOG!"

or

"I speak brilliant prose. I learn it from a boooook"

or

"This FA. This Blofeld. This smack on head." <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  11:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Haha great one!! Some of the editors we have here are indeed about as capable as Manuel!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Dodoma Region
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abdu Ali Abdul Rahman


The article Abdu Ali Abdul Rahman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 16:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I do have to laugh at a hit and run editor templating one of the most prolific writers on Wikipedia with pointers to Referencing for beginners and the help desk. So who did write all your FAs, Blofeld? <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  08:33, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

In the eyes of User:Jimbo Wales Ritchie, the amount of content put into the site is irrelevant; we're no more valuable to the website than those ips who may edit once in a blue moon.♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Miguel Laurencena
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  00:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)