User:DrPronoun/Algorithmic radicalization/Malak8462000 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

DrPronoun


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DrPronoun/Algorithmic_radicalization?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Algorithmic radicalization

Evaluate the drafted changes
The changes that the author is proposing to add to the already existing article are very insightful. There is an introduction to what algorithm radicalization is alongside things the media and government have been saying about the topic. All the work is cited correctly and the citation sources are neutral for example a piece from the Journal of American Philosophical Association. The text within the edits is also neutral never stating an opinion within the edits. One thing that was a bit perplexing was the possible solutions. Those things are only usually mentioned in a reaserch study or in an essay as a way to say there is a problem and something needs to change. It seemed to be the only part that didn't coincide with the neutral stance that wikipedia articles should encompass. Maybe if the heading was a different title than the information within the paragraph could stay since it was very insightful and explains a way that media can protect itself from algorithm radicalization and isn't biased. Overall, the edits adds a lot to the existing article and help round out some missing information that stays neutral and supported by insightful and non biased sources.