User:DrPronoun/Algorithmic radicalization/Wafflehouse777 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

DrPronoun


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DrPronoun/Algorithmic_radicalization/Wafflehouse777_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Algorithmic radicalization

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

In comparison to the original article, the draft provides better fundamental ideas. The author did a good job at defining specific terms or contemporary references while remaining neutral. However, there are a few things that can be improved and/or added to the draft, such as the organization of main ideas, which can be arranged in a way that provides some solid background to algorithmic radicalization, and on a technical level, being careful when using pronouns so as not to confuse readers, particularly during the article's introduction. Furthermore, providing examples relating to the issue, such as congressional hearings and even the capitol insurrection, could be useful in providing some scope on the issue. Overall, the article has good sources and can be used to strengthen key ideas in the draft to create a fantastic final article.