User:Dr Ashton/sandbox:example research article based edit

In an experimental study conducted on 324 undergraduate college students, Bushman examined brand recall for neutral, sexual or violent commercials embedded in neutral, sexual or violent TV programs. He found that found brand recall was higher for participants who saw neutral TV programs and neutral commercials versus those who saw sexual or violent commercials embedded in sexual or violent TV programs.

Posted on the talk page 4 days before

{| class="wikitable"
 * align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|Post-Edit Peer Review Form
 * Name of Student Reviewer:||William Ashton
 * Date of Review||2/8/13
 * Name of editor||Dr_Ashton
 * URL of editor’s Userpage||User:Dr_Ashton
 * Reference page number in Schultz & Schultz||
 * Permanent URL on PsycInfo of article|| http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2007-11795-006&site=ehost-live
 * Item||Points||Points Earned
 * Evidence of posting ahead of the edit on the talk page||1 point||1
 * Signed post on talk page||1 point||1
 * Each response to questions on talk page||1 point||0
 * Sandbox with intended edit||1 point||1
 * Number of sentences in edit ||1 point||2
 * Appropriate image in edit||1 point||0
 * Appropriate link to another Wikipedia page or external page||1 point||0
 * Textbook based reference information correct||1 point||--
 * Research article based reference information correct||1 point||1
 * Research article is empirical||1 point||1
 * Research article is peer-reviewed||1 point||1
 * Research article is primary||1 point||1
 * Reference and footnote formatted correctly||1 point||1
 * Each response on talk page after edit||1 point||0
 * Student made changes to article in response to editor comment||1 point||0
 * Each editor change to student’s edit||minus 1 point||0
 * Fancy formatting
 * (1 point for each up to 3 points for each: new section w/ heading; bulleted list; numbered list etc)||3 points||0
 * Total||---||10
 * Appropriate link to another Wikipedia page or external page||1 point||0
 * Textbook based reference information correct||1 point||--
 * Research article based reference information correct||1 point||1
 * Research article is empirical||1 point||1
 * Research article is peer-reviewed||1 point||1
 * Research article is primary||1 point||1
 * Reference and footnote formatted correctly||1 point||1
 * Each response on talk page after edit||1 point||0
 * Student made changes to article in response to editor comment||1 point||0
 * Each editor change to student’s edit||minus 1 point||0
 * Fancy formatting
 * (1 point for each up to 3 points for each: new section w/ heading; bulleted list; numbered list etc)||3 points||0
 * Total||---||10
 * Reference and footnote formatted correctly||1 point||1
 * Each response on talk page after edit||1 point||0
 * Student made changes to article in response to editor comment||1 point||0
 * Each editor change to student’s edit||minus 1 point||0
 * Fancy formatting
 * (1 point for each up to 3 points for each: new section w/ heading; bulleted list; numbered list etc)||3 points||0
 * Total||---||10
 * Fancy formatting
 * (1 point for each up to 3 points for each: new section w/ heading; bulleted list; numbered list etc)||3 points||0
 * Total||---||10
 * (1 point for each up to 3 points for each: new section w/ heading; bulleted list; numbered list etc)||3 points||0
 * Total||---||10
 * Total||---||10