User:Drabkin247/Sampat Pal Devi/Cindycyz Peer Review

General info
I am reviewing the work drafted by Magicalmermaid, Rainyfield637, Aloeveralove, and Drabkin247 on Sampat Pal Devi.
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Drabkin247/Sampat Pal Devi
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sampat Pal Devi

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * The article is currently lacking a lead section, so it might be good to add one so that readers can get an overall impression of the character being discussed.
 * Overall, the content is relevant to the topic. However, I think it would be better if there is a section that specifically talks about the personal life/background of Smpat Pal Devi (when she was born, when she died, her family, etc) so that readers could have a more complete understanding of her.
 * In terms of tone, I think there are parts where some phrases show biases rather than being neutral. For example, maybe try to avoid using extreme words like "poorest of the poor" and be cautious with the amount of adjectives being used like "pretty" and "passionately." The overall content is neutral as it shows different sides of Sampat Pal Devi in terms of both her positive contributions and scandals.
 * The article has a quite heavy reliance on news articles rather than scholarly sources. While I understand that this might be due to the relatively recent time frame, maybe try to find a few more scholarly secondary sources to reference to to enhance the reliability of the article.
 * Overall organization is good. Content is clear and easy to read, but could shorten some sentences to make it more concise.
 * It would be better to add an image of Sampat Pal Devi and an image of the organization's protest to supplement the article.
 * I think the article overall fits the notability requirement as it has two scholarly sources independent of the subject. It could include links to other articles to be more discoverable.