User:Drabkin247/Sampat Pal Devi/Starryberry Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Drabkin247
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Drabkin247/Sampat Pal Devi
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sampat Pal Devi

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * The lead has not been updated.
 * The content is relevant to the topic.The content is up to date to 2022.The information that is missing is background information about Sampat Pal Devi such as where she is from or birth year. It does address Wikipedia's equity gaps.
 * In "The Power of the Color Pink," there is no dates added and can be more concise on how the paragraph addresses the point they are making. The paragraph also mentions how Sampat Pal Devi has "modified the way in which women have been treated" and it would be helpful to add an example. There are also some issues with the word choice such as "modified the way in which women have been treated," and "for women to be included and feel significant."
 * Citations need to be added to the "Leadership of the Gulabi Gang" section. A question I have is what were the resources the group gave women to apply for aid or how did they do so?
 * The new content are supported by some reliable sources as The Times of India is not a reliable source according to the Wikipedia Reliable Sources. The sources are current. All the links work. There are more sources available at the UCLA Library.
 * The content is well-organized and most of the sections are well-written like the "Leadership", "Scandal", and "Political Aspirations" sections.
 * There is no media or images added.
 * The content does improve the overall quality of the article as it gives more in-depth knowledge about Sampat Pal Devi.