User:DreadnoughtusDino/Evaluate an Article

I evaluated the page Bryozoa, an animal that evolved in the Early Ordovician.

Content

The overall content of this page is sufficient. All of the information had credible sources cited that included charts and photos that were appropriate for the information. The images added to the content of the page, and did not distract or was off top. There are some questions within the information that could be addressed, but with my own research found that those questions have not been answered. The information that needs to be added to the page needs to first be discovered.

Tone

The tone of this article stayed scientific. All of the grammar was correct or had been corrected by another wiki user. There was no bias that could be seen throughout the page. In the Evolutionary Tree section, it clearly went through all types of evolution and different evolution of the bryozoans. Under the Ecology section, the subsection of Interactions with Humans was small and contained relevant information because there is little to no relation with humans.

 Sources 

For this page, there are 97 sources. After clicking on a couple of the sources, those few sources I clicked on were all credible and some were even peer-reviewed journals. This brings a level of sophistication to the article that might not be seen for all wikipedia pages. I did not see any articles that were out of place or lead away from the main topic at hand.

 Talk Page 

I really enjoyed reading through the talk page, actually. The talk page for this page was very well documented with the changes that were made to certain links and sentence structure. Some other changes, such as removing false or made up information. People really do have wild imaginations. It also has a rating of Good Article meaning that there is no original research, well written and broad in coverage with a neutral tone. It has a high importance on wiki scales, making this subject extremely notable.

There were no questions I felt like I could evaluate properly while leaving an answer that was decent for how high of level this article was ranked.