User:Dreese2/Magnolia Street/Trestrotter Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing
 * Dreese2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Dreese2/Magnolia Street


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
There wasnt much to review because there wasnt enough info. The history was very in depth. The page also seemed very disorganid and I couldnt tell where the article was heading .The information that was guven was clear and easy to read. What was provided was subjective and gave no opinion.There were 2 references that both worked.