User:Dreka37/Cannabis dispensaries in the United States/Miasalaun Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dreka37


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dreka37/Cannabis_dispensaries_in_the_United_States?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Cannabis dispensaries in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added by my peer. The lead does include an introductory sentence that is very clear and concise and does describe the article’s topic. The lead briefly describes a brief description of what the article is going to contain. The lead contains just enough information to lead us into the rest of the article. The content that is added is relevant to the topic. I believe that the content is up to date since there is a few sources from the past decade listed in the paragraphs. I don’t think that there is any content missing, but some of the content seems a little bit repetitive in certain areas especially because the article about marijuana mainly affects the health of people. From what I read I see that there is an equity gap. The article talked about how marijuana has the tendency to affect people’s mental abilities. The doesn’t address any topics that are related to historically underrepresented populations. The article does seem a bit persuaded towards a few sources particular position on opposing marijuana. The content added mainly persuades us to not legalize marijuana because of the effects that it can cause on the human body. I would say that the sources are pretty thorough. The sources listed are pretty current. I think that they chose the best links for this subject especially retrieving them from the websites from the government and the CDC. The article does not include any images in the sandbox, but on the actual articles page there is images. The images are well captioned and they do adhere to Wikipedia’s copyright regulations. The images are definitely appealing to the articles topic and do stand out. The article has more than 3 reliable sources that are independent of the subject. It does accurately represent all available literature because they used reliable sources from .gov websites. The sources are reliable and the links work. The content that was added really does help speak about why marijuana has such awful side effects to our health as people. The article just needed to be a little bit improved by adding some other facts about marijuana than just the issues that it causes our health. It was stated that cannabis is considered to be a non harmful substance but didn’t go much into depth about how this is. The article was strengthened by providing certain facts and citing the facts by giving credit where it is due. Overall, the article was smooth to read and had very resourceful information.