User:Drewcifer3000/RfA review

Questions
I'm not that active in the RfA process, so my answers might seem a little surface-level. Do with them what you will. So, I've eschewed the normal questions provided, since I don't have intelligent or well-informed responses to any of them. That said, this is my opinion on the RfA process in general: it's no big deal. I've only participated in a few RfAs, but people seem to have forgotten this. We're not giving people the keys to the front door of Wikipedia, so why all the fuss? If anything, we're giving them the keys to the broom closet. And I say if an editor has so far seemed level-headed and has unquestionably improved Wikipedia during their time as editor, we should encourage them to purse Administrator-hood, not comb through every edit they've ever made. RfA seems to me to have become a glorified background-check, rather than a process of deeming who would continue to improve Wikipedia if given a slightly larger toolset. I think the process has gotten a little to heavy-handed and seems to take itself far too seriously. Drewcifer (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)