User:Drfederico/sandbox/comments

I am part of the Wiki Education Scholars & Scientists Program and I chose Design thinking to assist WikiProject Industrial design which has listed this article with a C Quality C yet High Importance. I teach a 16-week Design Thinking course at the university level and curate a blog on design entrepreneurship. My Cengage textbook has four chapters on the design.

Take notes as you go. Over the next two weeks, we will discuss what you've found.

DT has become part of the Lean Startup approach.

DT article is a long list with no transition or logical flow.

Missing topics such as Designerly Perception

Review of Process Models over the last decade.

Important Pretotyping

You wouldn't be able to get a grounding in DT with this articles


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way you understand it?
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Think about sections, sources, and phrasing. Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Are important aspects of the subject missing or incorrect?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Wikipedia seeks to represent perspectives in proportion to their prominence in the body of literature on a subject. Are there viewpoints in the article that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference that supports the claim? Where does the information come from? How would you describe the quality of the sources?
 * If you were to grade this article, what grade would you give it?