User:Druidism/Romantic fallacy

The term was originally coined by Robert Ardrey in his book of African Genesis.It criticizes the tradition that was begun by Rousseau's noble savage argument in which he says people are essentially good. Ardrey additionally gives Marx, and Freud as the two thinkers who have most contributed to the creation of romantic fallacy. It is romantic because human-beings are not friendly, or lovely to each other in their innateness, but as in the whole of the book he argues, human-beings are just killer apes, and their evolution progressed upon their differentiation from the lower apes with their overt, and hypertrophied aggressiveness. Ardrey uses the term to criticize two important theorists of the 19th century, Marx, and Freud, because these two are the most important on the theories of human nature that is being constructed outside of the secular-Darwinian science. That is to say, Ardrey takes his orthodox scientist glasses, and criticizes, and curses the two theories that tries to rival the struggle-based theory of the evolution.Ardrey argues that Marx took the Roussean romantic approach to the human nature to the extreme use of whole human populations because he based the whole his socialist/communist ideas upon this axiom of good human nature. Marxian understanding of the world have influenced the millions( maybe billions) of people, and it continues to do so. And Freudian construction of the human nature, and explanations about the human behaviours are wholly based on the abstract-philosophical approaches, and it has nothing with the scientific evidences, and experiences, but, even so, there is a huge literature on this psychoanalytic approaches, and science of childhood experiences, and it continues to rival the determinist approaches of the Darwinian understanding. Ardrey curses these two "ideologies" as examples of romantic fallacies.