User:Druss321/Popular psychology/Chcam1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Druss321


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Druss321/Popular psychology


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Popular psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hey Druss,

The contributions that you have started to add to the article on Popular Psychology are significant so far, in my opinion. However, all drafts could be refined more. I would start by publishing the references you have curated in your sandbox draft onto the bibliography page so that it has one space designated on Wikipedia. Looking at the Lead section of the article, you would probably be fine without editing it heavily. However, I would still make sure the edits you've added reflect in this section as this project continues with major expansions.

A minor edit that I suggest regarding grammar would be fixing the following question: " Is there any evidence presented that uses the scientific method as a basis for what is presented being a fact?"

You could make this question more concise. I recommend editing this by rephrasing the question to: "Is the evidence presented utilizing scientific methodology as a basis for the provided facts within this scope of Psychology?"

Although the article you have chosen is about Popular Psychology, I could see you hyperlinking Positive Psychology to Popular Psychology. You have expanded on self-help books, including a book, and Positive Psychology is considerably connected to books. I also see in the later information mentioned also includes references to the social networking platform Zoom. You could also have a hyperlink to that specific topic. While the coronavirus pandemic left its mark on our world, you could potentially make a section on Popular Psychology and Coronavirus and expand with that contribution potentially. I see the direction the contributions that you have started to add will help this article become more relevant. The language of the contributions that you have included also remains neutral. I am impressed that you have used your sandbox to keep notes there, which has also inspired me to work.