User:Dsamu1/sandbox

Article Evaluation •	Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic if The Storm and there is nothing that distracted me, it is very straight forward. •	The article is neutral, as it is a summary rather than something that involves an opinion. •	There aren't any viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented in my personal view o	The citation links do work correctly and directly support the summary/story •	Each fact is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. I am able to tell this because the links left on the page directly support what was said. The information comes from other articles or wiki pages. These pages are neutral/ not biased o	The article was last updated 16 April 2018 so I believe it is up to date. I personally do not think anything could be added, very useful page. •	The way we discussed this article in class had mostly the same viewpoints that this summary did. •	No exact words from the story used without quotation marks. •	Also there are there inaccuracies in the plot summary. •	The quotations are used and seemed to be used correctly. •	The structure of the page is direct and to the point, not confusing at all.