User:Dsantiago19/Freestyle music/Shainaw Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The content that was added was well written. I assume it's going in the lead section of the article but it could also fit well within the origin section of the article or perhaps even in its own category. The section is concise and adds information that is not found elsewhere in the article. Additionally, this information is relevant and up to date. However the section is not entirely neutral as the last sentence says "This is part of the reason freestyle music never reached its full potential" I would advise cutting this line if it is based on personal opinion, however if this is a popular sentiment I would find a source and cite it. As someone unfamiliar with freestyle music I am curious to know what makes a freestyle track low quality vs high quality? Im also wondering how the creation/production of freestyle music is different around the country? Also what was was it about Miami freestyle that got it popularized on the radio vs New York?

All of the hyperlinks work and the sources support the sections claims. The source is older but that may be for the best as this section is covering the background of the freestyle music. It also appears to be neutral and thorough. I think adding one more source that goes into the history of the music division could be helpful.

The content added was really interesting and I think it will definitely improve the page.