User:Dsgm3r/Gold digger/Elaineamery Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dsgm3r


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gold digger
 * Gold digger

Evaluate the drafted changes
- The lead section does introduce the topic and give a short definition of the term. The lead section is very short though and does not include a summary of the information in the rest of the page, it defines the topic then jumps right into the article sections. I suggest adding more information to this section to give readers some idea of what is in the other sections on the page.

- The content is relevant to the topic, but it is a little out dated. This is especially apparent in the pop culture and music section, it contains examples from modern history but hardly anything after the turn of the century. I think it would be very easy to update this section with more current songs, I was able to think of Bills, Bills, Bills by Destiny's Child, National Anthem by Lana Del Rey, and Church Girl by Beyoncé (specifically the outro). I think there is a lot of information that can be added to this topic, the examples present are good but not very current.

- The information is neutrally presented and not persuasive one way or the other. The sources I clicked do work and there is a wide variety of sources from 1989 to 2020.

- This page is organized fairly well for the information it contains. The sections are clearly organized and contain information pertinent to the heading it is under. If the contributors do decide to add more current examples in media and music, I think they might be able to split those sections into past and present examples since some of the songs and movies given as examples are coming up on 100 years old.

- I think the images used to enhance the topic, but as other sections show, they are out dated. I think finding more current image examples would help enhance the page further to give historical and current understandings.