User:Dsgm3r/Gold digger/Karleeseek Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Gold digger


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The beginning of the article isn't even a lead, or a clerical definition. It makes a lot of assumptions about who a gold digger is, and how their relationships work. A good lead would be informational and provide a bit of historical context.

The content of the work needs a lot of improvement. There's mentioning of this historical background and when this term started getting thrown around, but it makes presumptions about the market of the world and doesn't update with the trend.

I love there are personal examples of people called gold diggers, but I need to know the context surrounding why. That would be something easy and impactful to add in.

There is also little reference to Kayne West's song with the same name, which honestly has a huge impact on how we view the term in culture today. I think that may deserve it's own section on cultural impact in the 21st century.

Basically, a lot of this is "here are all these women that we think are gold diggers, and here's where the word has been referenced". while the tone and content are neutral, this article could be exponentially impacted by expanding on the current cultural impact.

The photos/media are also very old, there should be plenty of stock images that can be added to this.

Over all, I think this is an interesting topic and you all have a lot to pick from and add in! This article is very early 20th century/white women based, so it would be really cool to see the intersectionality of gold digging.