User:Dsm9603/Solutrean hypothesis/Poiuytrewqlkjh Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dsm9603


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Dsm9603/Solutrean hypothesis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Solutrean hypothesis

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

 Lead Section: 

The lead section is well written and includes new information recently added. It is concise and presents the most important information discussed in the article. I see that there is a pasted section still waiting to be edited, and this section is perhaps too detailed to be included in the lead.

 Origin of Solutrean Culture: 

I recommend modifying the title of this section since although the Solutrean culture is related to the hypothesis, it might be a little distracting. Because the content you added in this section (Solutrean toolmaking) is closely related to the premise and origin of the Solutrean hypothesis, I think you could change the title to something like "Background of the Hypothesis." Also, this section only contains one relatively short paragraph. Is it possible to put the information somewhere else in the article (e.g. as a subsection of another section)?

 Characteristics of Solutrean Lithic Techniques: 

Maybe you can put the previous section into this big section since you are comparing the Solutrean techniques with those of Clovis.