User:Dstovall/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mary Hamilton Swindler

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I've had an interest in archeology for seeing past evidence in human life. I travelled to Moab, Utah and saw graphics and such on rocks and I was very intrigued.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is very short, but does still summarize what the rest of the article is about.

The article is neutral and relevant, but I think more information could be added. It does more focusing on her teaching life than her actual job as an archeologist, but tone is neutral. I think what's just missing is her life as an archeologist. It talked about where her work, so pictures of maybe what she helped find or where she worked would've been nice. This mostly focuses on her professor side. Organization is there with separate categories for contents, but little info to organize. As I said I would love to see more pictures of her work.

There is a lot of sources for what's provided, but I feel like the author could've grabbed more info out of those or maybe even find more work on her. The author might have little knowledge on her or there might be little info on her other than her professor side.

There isn't much on the talk page except her correct date of birth and some links modified. It does have a lot of wiki projects and rated C-Class with low importance. I don't know if there is more information to get from her, but I think it should be looked more into.