User:Dtbooth/3D bioprinting/Abudiman99 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dtbooth


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dtbooth/3D_bioprinting?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 3D bioprinting

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

 * It seems that the author has added new content in the "Printer" section by adding the Extrusion based method. The author has clearly broken the paragraphs efficiently into 1 main extrusion method and 2 other subtopic of extrusion method which makes it easy to understand.
 * The author has also described briefly what each of the main sections are before diving into the topic

Content

 * The content added is relevant to the section. However, I think the author can fix the paragraph above in the section had previously existed in the main Wikipedia page, just to make it flow better to his section.
 * Creating a table or just mentioning a paragraph of advantages or disadvantages of each main printing method would also be great to add.

Tone and Balance

 * Content added is neutral and merely informative without bias.

Sources and References

 * Sources used were published by reputable journal publishers and mostly current/up-to date
 * Although some sources were missing in the sandbox, it seems that think they were put in the right place into the main Wikipedia article

Organization

 * Content added is good and easy to read. However, there are some keywords that are difficult for me to understand so I'd have to search about them first. Adding hyperlinks or referring them to other Wikipedia pages would be a good idea.

Overall Impression

 * Overall, it does a great job in explaining what each of the extrusion methods are towards 3D bioprinting
 * Adding a picture for the extrusion based method would be a great idea for readers to see what its like. Also, adding hyperlinks to keywords (such as crosslinking, scaffold or auger crew) that link to other wikipedia articles would be helpful so readers can click on keywords that they don't understand.