User:Dude1107/Sabertooth fish/TrevorCameron Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dude1107 and cp31201


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * No Draft


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sabertooth fish

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead Section: The lead section of this article does a good job of introducing the Sabertooth fish and where it's found on Earth. It gives a good background and introduces the distinctive features of the fish.

Content: The article has relevant content that reflects the newest understandings of the fish. There are no sources used throughout the entire wikipedia article however, which is a large problem. The content is broken down into good subsections however.

Tone and Balance: The article is very neutral. It is about a specific species of fish so there is no room for bias at all. It doesn't spend too much time on one topic or skip over another, it is very thorough but in a concise manner. It does not attempt to persuade the reader in any way at all, it remains factual throughout.

Sources and References: The lack of sources is the largest problem with this page. A lot of information is provided and is not backed up with relevant scientific sources at all. Nothing is cited. There is a references section at the end, but it is impossible to tell what those sources reference.

Organization and Writing Quality: The article is very easy to read and is full of factual and informative, yet concise information. There are no grammar mistakes. Like previously mentioned, the article breaks down the page into subsections of the background, description, and life history.

Images and Media: One image is used at the top of the page. I would recommend adding more.

Talk Page Discussion: There are a very few discussions that are occurring. These talks discuss various content that is missing from the article itself that could be potentially added.

Overall Impressions: Overall the article does a fine job of detailing the Sabertooth fish. However, there are no sources cited so it is impossible to tell if this is reliable information. I would go back and add sources to every claim made.