User:Dumagoes/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

 * Name of article: (The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane)
 * I've chosen to evaluate this article because I had read this book a number of times, and I believe I can provide significant remarks on the article's page.

Lead
Lead evaluation

The Lead includes and introductory sentence that is too concise. A more detailed oil lengthy Lead would be provide more accuracy and interest. There is no description of the article's major sections.

Content evaluation
The article's content is very relevant to the topic, and it does not stray from the main points. It is up to date and was edited recently in 2020. There is a considerable amount of content missing in the plot and themes section. The plot needs to be elaborated, and the themes need to be discussed more.

Tone and balance evaluation
The article does not appear heavily biased toward a particular position. The author does a great job remaining neutral throughout the article.

Sources and References

 * Sources and references evaluation

Almost all the facts in the article are back up by a reliable secondary source. However, the theme section of the article needs a current reliable source. Also, the third, fifth, sixth, and seventh links do not work.

Organization evaluation
Although lacking in detail, the article is well-written and clear to read. It is well organized and broken down into important sections focusing solely on the book.

Images and media evaluation
The article includes only one image: the book's cover. It is well captioned and adheres to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. My only critique is that the article could include more images because the book includes a number of illustrations by the artist Bagram Ibatoulline.

Checking the talk page

 * Talk page evaluation

There are no conversations going on behind the scenes about how to represent the book. The article is part of the WikiProjects "WikiProject Novels" and "WikiProject Children's literature".

Overall impressions

 * Overall evaluation

The article's strength include conciseness and well-organization. The article could be improved with more detail and is somewhat underdeveloped.