User:Durova/Topic RfC

Following is a draft proposal

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment/Topic, at least six people need to show that they tried to resolve topic-level disputes regarding this matter and have failed. This must be an endemic problem relating to an article or group of articles and have demonstrable occurrences of offsite partisan recruiting. The persons opening this request must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: ~ ), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:, 29 July 2024 (UTC).


 * Example topic
 * Relevant article 1
 * Relevant article 2

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
''This is a summary written by users who are concerned by events at this topic. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.''

Desired outcome
''This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly why they believe there is a comprehensive problem at the topic, what specific features that problem has, and what solutions they believe are relevant and realistic.''

Description
''{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}''

Accounts and IP addresses involved
(List the accounts and IP addresses directly involved in this matter).

Evidence of disputed onsite behavior
(Provide diffs to specific instances and describe them. Links to entire articles aren't helpful, nor are edit histories.)

Evidence of disputed offsite behavior
{Provide links to offsite fora where recruiting occurred. Private e-mails cannot be published on Wikipedia without the author's consent. Bear in mind the Foundation privacy policy and do not link to sites that disclose a pseudonymous editor's real name unless that person has voluntarily disclosed his or her own identity on Wikipedia.)

Applicable policies and guidelines
{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links)

Evidence of failing to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links to demonstrate that the disputed behavior continued after trying to resolve the dispute)

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}



Response
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.'' ''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view
''This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.<!--