User:Durruti36/sandbox

[| BLP Noticeboard]


 * So far as I know there is no separate policy allowing a looser standard for sourcing on talk pages when it comes to material concerning living persons. Are you claiming that is the case? If so, on what basis. If not, then the same criteria apply to both the main article and the talk page, meaning that all unsourced or poorly sourced contentious content should be removed immediately, without discussion.
 * 1. "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." (source: Biographies_of_living_persons)
 * 2. "Wikipedia's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation; material not meeting this standard may be removed. This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion. This applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable, and whether it is in a biography or in some other article." (source: BLP: Challenged or likely to be)
 * 3. "In the case of public figures, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented, it belongs in the article — even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If you cannot find multiple reliable third-party sources documenting the allegation or incident, leave it out." (source: BLP: Public Figures)
 * 4. "Wikipedia contains biographical material on people who, while notable enough for an entry, are not generally well known. In such cases, exercise restraint and include only material relevant to their notability, focusing on high quality secondary sources. Material published by the subject may be used, but with caution; see above. Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special care; in many jurisdictions, repeating a defamatory claim is actionable, and there is additional protection for subjects who are not public figures." (source: BLP: People who are relatively unknown)

Francesco Cattani da Diacceto
(put here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francesco_Cattani_da_Diacceto&action=submit )

Francesco Cattani da Diacceto ( Florence, 16 November 1466 - Florence , 10 April 1522 ) was a Platonic philosopher of the Italian Renaissance who was considered by Marsilio Ficino to be his successor as the head of the Platonic Academy of Florence.