User:Dwlehm1/Bernold of Constance/Cjleaps42 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Dwlehm1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Dwlehm1/Bernold of Constance


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bernold of Constance

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article is very straightforward and easy to read but lacks a significant amount of context. I had trouble following because there were lots of terms left unspecified. There’s lots of information about where Bernold lived and what he was doing during those times but there is no information on why he was there or chosen for those jobs which could explain his significance.

I noticed a few biases like “renowned” but with no context I could not debate whether the teacher was impressive or not due to lack of context. I think there’s a lot more on his works mentioned in the original article that I’d be interested in hearing about once you add some resources. The headings made sense and set a decent outline for once there’s more research completed.